Core billing
Claim preparation, submission, payment posting, and monthly reporting. The steady work most practices want off their desk.
- Daily claim submission
- Posting and reconciliation
- Monthly operating summary
There is no honest flat rate for medical billing. Volume, specialty, payer mix, authorization density, and how much of the cycle you keep in-house all change the work. What we can promise is a proposal that names every one of those assumptions.
Scope is agreed in writing before any work begins. Mix and match to fit how your practice runs.
Claim preparation, submission, payment posting, and monthly reporting. The steady work most practices want off their desk.
For practices with a backlog. Denials classified and worked, aging balances split into queues, and follow-up documented.
When the practice keeps part of the cycle in-house. We take a defined slice and report on it clearly.
A billing agreement that is vague about scope is expensive later. These are the items we expect to see in any proposal, ours or a competitor's.
More claims mean more work, but less per claim.
Medicaid and managed-care plans need more follow-up per dollar.
Procedures and drugs add tracking work before the claim.
One integrated system is cheaper than three that do not talk.
Clean notes reduce rework and records requests.
Keeping the front office in-house lowers the fee.
If yours is not here, ask it on a call. The answer is usually short.
Both exist, and the right one depends on the work. Percentage-based fees suit full revenue-cycle management because they scale with volume. Flat fees suit narrow scopes like credentialing tracking or a one-time A/R project. We will tell you which we think fits and why.
Volume matters less than complexity. A high-claim-volume practice with clean workflows is easier than a low-volume practice with four systems, heavy prior authorization, and a large self-pay balance. Payer mix, authorization density, and documentation quality drive cost more than the number of providers.
Sometimes, when the backlog or system setup is substantial. It is always stated separately in the proposal so you can see it before signing.
Typically: malpractice or compliance consulting, software licenses, clearinghouse fees, postage for patient statements, and legal review of payer contracts. Anything outside scope is named in the proposal.
Payment posting and clean claim flow improve in the first month. Denial rate and A/R aging are lagging measures, so expect two to three months before the trend is meaningful.
Request a free audit. We will look at your recent claims and tell you what we would fix first — no obligation, and no patient information needed to get started.